The fickle mind of
President Bush
Commentary
by PAT MURPHY
We have the
word of George W. Bush that he won’t use the war on terrorism for
political purposes, right?
Many
Americans are gullible enough to buy into that, of course.
But they
should consider how the president is playing politics with terrorism.
Foremost in
the strategy is the president’s constant, unrelenting, often tiresome
speeches he makes wherever he goes—that America is at war and Americans
will pay whatever price is required in the war on terrorism.
This tactic
is designed to immunize him against criticism of domestic programs that
are veering the nation toward economic instability by attempting to
demonize anyone who criticizes him as unsympathetic to the war on
terrorists.
(Last week,
as proof of the conditioning of public attitudes, there was an angry
Letter to the Editor in the Boise newspaper lambasting a columnist as
"unpatriotic" for criticizing Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne during
these times.)
"War"
talk also allows the president to conceal his hypocrisy.
Such as:
while campaigning for president in 2000, Bush was harshly critical of the
Crusader howitzer, an $11 billion artillery system proposed in 1992 during
the Clinton years that Bush’s own defense adviser, John Hillen,
sneeringly described as "the best artillery piece that engineers and
strategists of the 1970s could ever imagine."
Bush
himself said he’d terminate the Crusader as "too heavy" and
"not lethal enough" for modern warfare.
Ah, but
candidate Bush’s disdain for an obsolete weapon has been overtaken by
the enthusiasm of President Bush, who suddenly finds the weapon necessary
– his reawakening came after discovering that his father and some pals
from Bush the Elder’s White House years (former Secretary of State James
Baker and former Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci) are principals in the
Carlyle Group, whose company, United Defense Industries Inc., will
manufacture the Crusader artillery gun and win the $11 billion contract.
n
And then
there’s this change of heart from the former Texas governor who promised
as president he’d show more respect for the needs of the states.
As governor
of Texas, Bush railed against President Clinton and Congress for failing
to reimburse states for costs of imprisoning illegal immigrants convicted
of crimes.
Said Gov.
Bush in 1995 while suing Washington for $5 billion: "If the federal
government cannot do its job of enforcing the borders, then it owes the
states monies to pay for its failure."
But now:
Bush’s new budget abandons the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program,
which last year budgeted $535 million for hundreds of state and local
governments to pay costs of keeping illegal immigrant criminals behind
bars.
Bush’s
spokesperson argues that the program doesn't "advance the core
mission of the Justice Department."
Figure that
one.