Constitutional
amendment needs amending
Blaine
County could face a lawsuit every time it makes a development decision if
a proposed constitutional amendment gets the support of the Legislature.
And there’s a good chance it will.
The House
State Affairs Committee thought highly enough of the proposal to send it
to the floor with a 16-3 vote last week. Only Democrats opposed the
measure.
The
amendment would blast local planning and zoning provisions to smithereens.
It would render the most powerful tool for the protection of the quality
of life in Idaho utterly useless. It could leave cities and counties
helpless to balance development.
Under the
amendment, any rule or regulation that restricts or impairs the use or
economic value of real property would be a "taking." If an
ordinance were found to be a "taking," local government would
either have to compensate a property owner, or drop the ordinance.
The
amendment sounds reasonable enough, but it’s not.
Counties
and cities will be damned if they do, and damned if they don’t. If they
approve a development the neighbors hate, the amendment invites the
neighbors to sue. If they don’t approve a development that will raise
the underlying land values, the amendment invites developers to sue.
It leaves
local government in a terrible fix.
It could
put planners in straitjackets. It could lead to unrestrained sprawl,
uncontrollable pressure on infrastructure, and community deterioration.
Idaho
already has a well-developed body of "takings" law that is
balanced with the need for community planning.
The Idaho
Cattle Association and the Idaho Water Users Association are pushing the
amendment, apparently to protect their lands and livelihoods. Agricultural
lands need protection. However, the amendment is too broad and its impacts
too unpredictable.
The
Legislature should do every community in the state a favor, and send the
amendment back to the drawing board.