Idaho’s ‘slippery
slope’
Commentary
by PAT
MURPHY
Since they
may have forgotten, it’s worth reminding the ends-justify-the-means
thinkers at the Idaho Capitol:
The reason
the United States has remained so strong and resilient through crises, and
so envied by millions, who’re scrambling to emigrate here, is because of
our openness, our freedoms and minimal heavy-handedness in our laws.
Yet, in the
name of "protecting" Idahoans, state Attorney General Alan Lance
and like-minded legislators are needlessly considering laws that are
endemic to repugnant authoritarian regimes in countries abroad.
Lance’s
innocuous sounding proposed laws shutting down public access to public
documents in the name of anti-terrorism are the first small steps toward
the proverbial "slippery slope" that start innocently enough but
ultimately lead to even worse.
Will the
proposed laws have a sunset date to expire? Will they contain a catchall
provision conveying to Lance, the governor or some other authority the
arbitrary power to seal any public documents in the name of
"security"?
Come, come.
Does anyone seriously believe that Idaho state government is on the
priority list of international terrorists? Mountain Home Air Force Base,
maybe.
If
terrorists are intent on some maniacal act here, simply sealing a few
documents won’t discourage them.
It’s
obvious that all the questionable, frantic, sometimes theatrical efforts
in the name of security by Gov. Dirk Kempthorne and Attorney General Lance
have been to protect the state’s political class and their papers,
which, to put it bluntly, are far less critical to the state’s and
nation’s survival than a long list of other institutions, facilities and
individuals.
Everyone
who lived through the era of smoke-filled, backroom wheeling and dealing
before "Government in the Sunshine" laws remember abuses of the
public trust by bureaucrats and politicians in the name of
"efficient" government.
One can
only imagine what documents some politicians in Idaho would like to seal
from public inspection in the name of security, just as President Bush has
signed an order making it difficult for historians to access presidential
papers, an act that some suspect is designed to conceal controversial
conduct of his father.
Kempthorne’s
and Lance’s progressively more stringent "security" measures
also fly in the face of the Republican Party’s mantra that it is a
bulwark against too much government policing people’s lives.
Gosh, what
next out of the politicians? Is it possible some state legislator trying
to protect his job will claim that Osama bin Laden is really behind term
limits to deprive state government of career politicians?
•
How ironic:
the cynical executives at Enron and its see-no-evil auditor, Arthur
Andersen, have become a blessing to America’s most scornful critic of
politicians and corporations, consumerist gadfly-turned-Green Party
presidential candidate Ralph Nader.
Congressional
Republicans and Democrats by dozens gladly took Enron and Arthur Andersen
campaign cash. And since the system that’s supposed to protect workers
and investors ¾ regulators, Wall Street analysts, auditors, corporate
CEOs ¾ failed, Nader can crow "I told you so": avaricious
politicians and corporations are in a nefarious complicity and can’t be
trusted.
For months
to come, Nader will feast joyously on headlines spewing from Washington
investigations into Enron and Arthur Andersen of sleazy corporate conduct.
Nader will
try to convert the daily testimony into political advantage for his Green
Party, which collected 2.8 million votes of the 2000 presidential vote
(2.74 percent of the total) and has eclipsed the boom-and-bust populism of
Pat Buchanan.
Whereas
Nader’s message might’ve been dismissed, it now has new credibility
because of corporate executives and politicians who lived up to his
accusations.