Wishful thinking
When George
Herbert Walker Bush ran for the 1980 Republican presidential nomination,
he dubbed opponent Ronald Reagan’s fiscal promises "voodoo
economics."
After
losing the primary but becoming Reagan’s vice president, Bush forever
abandoned the "voodoo economics" accusation out of loyalty,
although some believe that history ultimately proved him to be more
correct than in error.
But, irony
of ironies, Bush the Elder’s son, President George W. Bush, seems mired
20 years later in "voodoo economics."
Why?
Bush the
Junior’s $1.8 trillion tax cut earlier this year wiped out the nation’s
hefty rainy day federal surplus without noticeably lifting the economy out
of its malaise. Now, as if to multiply his original error, he believes
more tax cuts are the salvation, along with huge spending programs that
have soared past $100 billion for emergency aid to nose-diving airlines,
fighting the terrorism war, helping rebuild New York and relief for the
jobless.
But there’s
more: Lavish spending will be needed to eliminate the U.S. vulnerability
to biological and chemical warfare; expensive new airport security
measures; more billions for aiding millions of Afghanistan refugees that
Bush promises not to "walk away" from; billions for Bush’s
exotic outer space missile defense system plus his major new spending on
domestic programs.
Surely,
wiping out a surplus, cutting taxes and increasing spending is not a
prescription for stimulating a nation’s stumbling economy.
Instead, it’s
a formula for crippling new deficits; for dipping into Social Security
surpluses that candidate Bush vowed he’d never touch, plus federal
borrowing that’ll create new debt and lead to higher inflation.
Only the
foolhardy believe that the terrorism war of 2001 will resemble the
economic boom inspired by World War II’s all-out defense spending. In
1944, defense accounted for 38 percent of the Gross Domestic Product;
today’s defense spending will barely be 4 percent of GDP.
Mind you,
Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan also dreamed of manipulating the
sliding economy, only to see 15 changes in the interest in 27 months (six
times up, nine times down) fizzle.
President
Lyndon Johnson (1963-65) unwittingly gave his White House successors a
valuable, but painful, economic lesson— that Americans cannot wage a
major war in Vietnam and enjoy the bounty of carefree "Great
Society" spending at home.
LBJ’s
stubborn "guns and butter" mind set—described in author Irving
Bernstein’s 1996 book, "Guns or Butter: The Presidency of Lyndon
Johnson" (Oxford University Press) as "a tragedy of epic
proportions"—seems to have escaped the current brash young
wishful-thinking president who seems short on U.S. history.