Playing Politics
Rare,
indeed, is the public allowed a peek inside a politically appointed body
to see what really lies beneath the façade.
That came
when Idaho Mountain Express reporter Greg Stahl chatted with one of Idaho’s
most respected and experienced conservation officers, Lee Frost.
Frost
retired Sept. 1 after 29 years with the Department of Fish and Game, and
now speaks freely about his department’s intellectual independence being
increasingly muzzled by the politics of the seven members of the
governor-appointed policymaking Idaho Fish and Game Commission.
What Frost
saw was a department on which the public depended for sensible,
straight-talking, science-based management of wildlife being cowered by
political appointees whose concerns fall far short of the higher purposes
of Fish and Game programs.
"Politics
have just gotten incredible," is how Frost describes the environment.
"We’ve lost a lot of good people who won’t compromise good, sound
science for politics."
No longer
is Fish and Game the voice of authority once sought for its opinion on
Idaho’s wildlife. The politically appointed commission has effectively
muzzled the department.
When Frost
spoke out critically of clashing philosophies, he was threatened in a
letter from Fish and Game Director Rod Sando with discipline for
"publicly airing internal disagreements or misunderstandings (that)
derail both the commission and the agency’s efforts to regain this
public trust. . . ."
Frost’s
revelations didn’t deserve recriminations, but praise, for giving the
public a whiff of a smelly condition in a vital agency whose expertise is
being compromised.
As for
Frost’s destroying public trust, appointees to the Fish and Game
Commission are doing just fine fouling public confidence without any help.
Do state
legislators have as much starch in their spines as Lee Frost and be
willing to ask whether Idaho conservation programs are being crippled for
political motives? Better yet, do they have the spine to change it?