Retiree faults Fish
and Game politics
Frost says current
policies harm wildlife
"Right
now, the commission is out of control on the predator issue. They, for
whatever reason, have decided to manage for several species at the expense
of predators. It’s not healthy for the department, the people or the
resource."
Lee
Frost, Idaho
Department of Fish and Game conservation officer
By GREG
STAHL
Express Staff Writer
In his
29-year career with the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Hailey-based
Conservation Officer Lee Frost has seen his fair share of what he views as
ups and downs in Idaho’s approaches to wildlife management.
Unfortunately,
Frost, an outspoken maverick among his colleagues, feels like he is
retiring from the department on a low note. His last day in the field was
Saturday, Sept. 1.
"I’m
one of those people who see wildlife as having intrinsic value in their
mere existence," he said during a recent outing to stock Little Lost
Lake in the Smoky Mountains with 50 grayling fingerlings. "It seems
like things in the past were more thought out with more science behind
them."
After
29 years working for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Conservation
Officer Lee Frost, a Hailey Resident, is retiring. Express
photo by Greg Stahl
Frost, 51,
is fit and lean. He sat with a relaxed posture on the bank of Little Lost
Lake with the Smoky Mountains’ ridges etching jagged lines against the
cloud-patched sky behind him.
At the core
of his current dissatisfaction with the agency he’s worked for since he
was 22 are what he considers politicized approaches to wildlife management
brought to the table by the Idaho Fish and Game Commission. The
seven-member, governor-appointed board of officials is charged with
setting policy and direction for oversight of the state’s wildlife.
In other
words, the Department of Fish and Game provides science on which decisions
can be founded, but the Fish and Game Commission doesn’t always base its
decisions on the science provided, Frost said.
"In
the past 10 years, the politics have just gotten incredible," he
said. "They’ve always been there, but the way they are now is not
good for the resource. That’s been real disheartening from the
perspective of someone who’s working in the natural resource
field."
As an
example, Frost cited an otter trapping season the Fish and Game Commission
adopted in May 2001. There was not sufficient biological information on
Idaho otters to support a season, and the proposal was rammed down
Idahoans’ throats by the commission with little public scrutiny, Frost
charged.
"On
paper, we (the department) did recommend it, because the commission
requested us to recommend it," he said.
After
publicly airing his concerns about the otter season last June, Frost
received a letter of reprimand from Fish and Game Director Rod Sando that
threatened his job should he continue to expose controversial aspects of
decisions by the department or commission.
"Any
future public comment that either harms or makes the mission of the
department or commission appear controversial or presents the department
and commission as being ‘at odds’ with each other will subject you to
disciplinary action," Sando stated.
"As
you are aware, Idaho Department of Fish and Game is in the process of
rebuilding public support and acceptance for our programs after some
difficult legislative and financial times…Events such as publicly airing
internal disagreements or misunderstandings derail both the commission and
the agency’s efforts to regain this public trust and, frankly, make my
work with the commission more difficult."
As Sando
indicated, Fish and Game has trod rocky roads in the recent past.
In 1999,
the commission fired IDFG Director Steve Mealey on a four-to-three vote,
the same count he was hired BY in 1996.
Mealey’s
critics on the commission charged he was too political.
During a
bitter public debate over options for salmon recovery and the potential
for dam breaching on the lower Snake River, Mealey worked hard and
successfully to secure support in the state Legislatlure’s House
Resources Committee for a department fee increase.
The full
House was on the verge of passing a fee increase bill the day Mealey was
fired. After his firing, the bill was dropped. Both the Idaho House and
Senate formally expressed strong support for the fired director.
Nonetheless,
the Legislature’s failure to grant the fee increase stymied a
cash-strapped agency that was entering tough times without a director.
Mealey was fired for being too political, and the Idaho Legislature
returned the favor with politics.
And that’s
only a smidgen of the difficult history.
More
recently, a commission-approved predator eradication plan for southern
Idaho was successfully challenged in court. The idea was to conduct an
experiment to examine the effects reduced predator numbers would have on
southern Idaho sage grouse populations.
The plan’s
critics said habitat, not predator populations, needs to be fixed for sage
grouse populations to recover.
A reporter’s
phone calls to a Fish and Game biologist on the topic were fruitless. The
biologist said she had been asked not to speak publicly on the issue.
"Right
now, the commission is out of control on the predator issue," Frost
said. "They, for whatever reason, have decided to manage for several
species at the expense of predators. It’s not healthy for the
department, the people or the resource."
The Fish
and Game Commission drew wide-spread fire last winter for a project
approved for this spring and summer in the Clearwater River basin in North
Idaho that was designed to give elk populations a boost. The plan targeted
black bears and mountain lions, two species that prey on elk, for removal.
Elementary
school children, environmentalists and Idaho citizens were outraged.
"I
speak out, not against Fish and Game, but against the commissioners who
propose this killing of bears and lions," Sally Maughan, president of
Idaho Black Bear Rehab, said.
Frost’s
complaints are step-in-step with Maughan’s. It’s the Fish and Game
Commission’s apparent focus on "hook-and-bullet" policies that
upset him, he said.
"I
would like to see our goal for fish and wildlife in the state be more
towards preservation of species rather than fishing and hunting," he
said. "Obviously, it would have to take a change in philosophy, but
if your sole goal is to produce to kill, it’s not managing the whole
resource. All of our money, all of our manpower, goes to produce to
kill."
To that
end, Frost doesn’t hunt or fish, but he said hunting and fishing are
activities he deems appropriate so long as management for those activities
doesn’t occur at the expense of non-game species.
"Our
agency hasn’t managed wildlife, per se. We’ve manipulated it. If we
were managing it, we’d spend our money on improving habitat. We’re
manipulating for revenue," he said.
"We’ve
lost a lot of good people who won’t compromise good, sound science for
politics."
Frost said
the department used to take stands on grazing, logging and mining issues
in the state. No more.
"Those
are the kinds of things the public doesn’t see immediately, but they
have a long-term effect on the resource," he said.
•
Despite
enduring politics and management policies he did not always agree with,
Frost hasn’t spent 29 years of his life working at a job he didn’t
like.
"Quite
frankly, I got to do things that lots of people only dream about or watch
on TV," he said. "The job was very interesting. No two days were
the same."
Among the
best perks for this gregarious wildlife enthusiast were working with local
folks to help solve wildlife-related problems.
"It’s
satisfying to leave somebody with a much larger respect for the issues
they’re dealing with," he said. "When it comes to natural
resources, Blaine County is certainly an anomaly compared ton the rest of
the state. Blaine has that quality and compassion for wildlife."
As for Fish
and Game’s future, Frost said the department is in pretty good hands
with newly-hired Director Sando at the helm, even if a potential
turn-around in policy decisions isn’t on the immediate horizon.
"I
think he’s a good director, but he’s walking right now on a tight rope
at the pleasure of the commission," Frost said. "The tight rope
that he’s on is trying to do what’s right for the resource and what
the legislature and the governor want him to do for the resource, and
these two things are incredibly divergent right now."