Groups sue to
protect wolves
SNRA grazing
restrictions requested
"Grazing
did get second shrift in the passage of the SNRA statute—that’s
because it’s such an incredible place"
— William
Eddie, Attorney
for Land and Water Fund of the Rockies.
By GREG
MOORE
Express Staff Writer
In an
effort to reduce the number of wolves killed for preying on livestock, two
local conservation groups filed a lawsuit last week demanding that more
aggressive measures be taken to protect sheep and cattle herds in the
Sawtooth National Recreation Area.
The Idaho
Conservation League and Western Watersheds Project filed the suit against
the U.S. Forest Service on Friday in federal district court in Boise.
The suit
follows the June 29 killing by U.S. Wildlife Service gunners of two wolves
from the White Hawk pack, which has roamed through the White Cloud
Mountains. Since wolves were reintroduced in Idaho in 1995 and 1996, the
agency or ranchers have legally killed 24 preying on livestock. An
additional 14 have been killed illegally.
Wolf
advocates were especially upset about the June 29 wolf shootings because
they believed the owner of the eight sheep killed by the wolves had moved
his herd into an area where the wolves were known to be living.
The lawsuit
contends that under the 1972 law creating the SNRA, grazing on public land
there can be allowed only so long as it does not impair the purposes for
which the SNRA was established, one of which is wildlife protection.
"Grazing
did get second shrift in the passage of the SNRA statute—that’s
because it’s such an incredible place," said plaintiffs’ attorney
William Eddie, of the Land and Water Fund of the Rockies.
The suit
asks the court to order the Forest Service to revise its management
practices to minimize harm to the wolves.
In their
complaint, the environmental groups suggest that possible management
changes could include altering times and locations of grazing, reducing
livestock numbers and better guarding or otherwise protecting the herds.
The Forest
Service has instituted some changes in the SNRA this summer by requiring
shepherds to maintain clean camps and use "hazing" methods, such
as loud noises, to keep wolves away from sheep. Volunteers have also been
helping to guard herds.
However,
the 1994 federal rule authorizing reintroduction of wolves as an
"experimental" species, promulgated by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act, states that management
of wolves "would not cause major changes to existing private or
public land-use restrictions," so long as at least six breeding pairs
of wolves are established in Idaho. Carter Niemeyer, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service wolf recovery coordinator for Idaho, said there are now
at least 15 breeding pairs in the state.
In
February, SNRA Area Ranger Deb Cooper said she interpreted the rule to
mean she could not confine grazing to certain areas to facilitate wolf
recovery.
The wolves
will be removed from Endangered Species Act listing once there are 30
breeding pairs for three years throughout the three areas where they were
introduced—Idaho, northwest Montana and the Greater Yellowstone area.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decides whether to recommend delisting
each December. As of last December, there were an estimated 29 breeding
pairs.
However, Ed
Bangs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf recovery coordinator, said
there are now about 48 breeding pairs, including 16 in Idaho. Bangs said a
recommendation for delisting could come as early as December 2002, since
research could indicate there were more breeding pairs than thought in
2000.
Once
delisting occurs, management will be turned over to the states under plans
approved by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Bangs said hunting of wolves
would likely become part of the species’ management. However, if the
number of breeding pairs falls below 30, wolves would again be listed
under the Endangered Species Act and returned to federal management. Bangs
said he thinks that is unlikely to happen.