Silver Creek
conservation
conflict resolved
By TRAVIS
PURSER
Express Staff Writer
To
compensate for violating a conservation easement on Silver Creek property
last summer, the Purdy ranching family has agreed to increase the amount
of its land protected from development by 200 acres and to repair about
three-quarters of a mile of cattle-damaged stream bank, according to Geoff
Pampush, director of The Nature Conservancy of Idaho.
Nick Purdy
did not respond to several Mountain Express phone messages this
week. But in a statement to the conservancy, he wrote, "The violation
was unintentional, but we realize it needed to be solved."
He stated
that he was "satisfied" with the solution.
The Purdys
have also agreed to amend the easement to clarify points about the size
and design of homes the family can build on the protected land, Pampush
said. And the family has agreed to support the conservancy in its request
that the Blaine County planning department notify holders of conservation
easements whenever property owners ask to develop the land.
The
compensation measures follow six months of negotiations during which the
conservancy and the family worked to settle a dispute over a home the
Purdy’s built on their Double R Ranch immediately downstream from the
world famous Silver Creek Preserve.
Under the
terms of the conservation easement the family entered into with the
conservancy in 1998, the Purdys could build on their 3,460 acres up to
five homes that were no larger than 2,500 square feet and 16 feet high.
In exchange
for building fewer homes than they might have been able to under county
land development rules, the Purdy’s get a tax break.
The first
home, completed last year, however, is 28 feet high and occupies between
2,700 and 3,782 square feet, depending on whether finished floor area or
the entire area under the roof is measured.
It was a
lack of specifics on how to measure the size of the cabins that Pampush
and the Purdys say caused the problem.
The home
raised the ire of conservationists, who said it violates the spirit of
conservation easements, which is to preserve the character of farmland and
native animal habitat.
However,
Pampush said Monday he believes any ill effect the violation might have
had on securing future easements or maintaining existing ones has been
avoided, because "we’ve resolved the issue."
In fact, he
believes it will have a positive effect because everyone involved has
learned how to avoid similar mistakes in the future.
Steve
Wolper, founder of the Blaine County Citizens for Smart Growth advocacy
group, said he is "concerned" that the settlement doesn’t
adequately compensate for the damage done to the scenic values of Silver
Creek.
Also, he
said, the county should adopt an ordinance requiring applicants for
building permits to notify the county about any existing conservation
easements.
A county
permit the Purdy’s held to build a second 2,500-square-foot home expired
in December 1999, and the family has not yet secured a new one.