No simplistic
solutions to growing energy demand
Commentary by PAT
MURPHY
In a society that’s
literally hooked on computers, what happens if the switches are turned
on and there’s no juice?
The ripple effect
of an electricity shortage would be unthinkable.
Impossible? Not
according to one of the nation’s respected energy experts, Roger
Anderson, of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory,
who’s given us a wake-up call.
Anderson
characterizes the coming of computers and the Internet as one of three
major 20th century technological breakthroughs that have
placed unusual burdens on electricity resources. The other two were the
arrival of lights and motors in the early 1900s and air conditioning in
the 1950s.
Now, he argues
that unless $50 billion is invested in new electrical transmission lines
connecting nine separate national grid systems, plus computerized
controls, energy-hungry computer equipment concentrated in certain areas
will be at risk.
These statistics
tell the story of demand: in 1995, there were 20,000 servers in the
world servicing computers. Today, there are 6 million servers and 200
million personal computers.
One reason
computer users and therefore the public as a whole are ignorant about
electricity demands of computers is because servers that gobble up
energy are out of sight. They are located far away in places known as
server farms. One such proposed server farm in the South Bronx, for
example, will need twice as much electricity as the entire World Trade
Center complex.
Anderson is
alarmed that President Bush’s budget doesn’t contain any funding for
development of a command and control system for rapidly shifting power
from one grid in one part of the nation to another where demand might be
urgent.
If major
electricity shortages shut down servers and computers throughout the
country like blackouts have interrupted California life, essential
national services would be paralyzed ¾ banking, air traffic control,
health care, virtually all media, corporate records, government at all
levels, industry manufacturing, hospitals, not to speak of millions of
PC users who’ve built their lives and small businesses around their
desktops.
A disturbing
indication of the Bush administration’s attitude on electricity is in
this development a few days ago.
When Californians
pleaded for price controls on soaring costs of electricity (some
estimates say they’ve jumped as much as 700 percent in some cases),
President Bush pooh-poohed the urgency and said the free market would
take care of the problem.
So, will the
president and his mentors casually rely on the free market to solve
problems affecting the nation’s computers and their servers?
Whatever its
virtues, the free market lacks the authority to create and enforce
interconnections between nine national electrical grids with a single
command and control system.
If energy expert
Anderson is correct, and demand continues to outstrip supply of
electricity, the Bush presidency that seems intent on turning back the
clock in so many other ways could be risking rolling back the clock in
the computer age.
Will manual
typewriters and hand cranked adding machines return to America’s
future?