Digital
moths:
a cautionary tale
Sometimes the
Digital Age doesn’t live up to its promise. Sometimes, its failures
are downright scary.
Last week, readers
of the Idaho Mountain Express opened their papers hoping to find
out who was getting married, who’d been born, who had died and who had
gone to court. What they found on the pages containing the News of
Record was columns of what looked like moth-eaten type.
Some readers
blamed their glasses. Others blamed fat-fingered typists for the
"typos." Some blamed proofreaders. Techies blamed a power
glitch.
Here at the
newspaper, we would have been happy to find that an epidemic of
"typo flu" had caused the errors. We would have chortled with
joy to learn that a power glitch had produced the digital moths.
The real cause was
far more alarming because of its implications.
Finding the answer
to the mystery was not easy. It took the help of an expert in Great
Britain. He gave us a clue. What followed was hours of examination and
re-examination of every step in the electronic assembly of newspaper
pages. It took hours of sifting through messages posted on three
different software web sites. It took hours of systematically going
through software manuals until a techie found an arcane and barely
readable footnote that contained another clue.
So, what was it?
A software
programmer in a place far away, probably after having had a seriously
bad day, had decided not to follow a basic industry standard for
generating the letters you see on this page. The "glitch" lay
waiting like a submerged log in a cascading stream of bits and bytes.
Rafters and
kayakers call submerged logs and branches "strainers."
We got strained,
and it got our attention.
The nation is like
this newspaper. We have embraced technology like a new best friend. And
why not? Computers have made us more productive and the Internet has
made the world one big information exchange.
Unfortunately, our
new best friend is an indifferent one. Silicon chips don’t give a whit
about us.
Yet, the nation
has become utterly dependent on computers for things like power grid
management, air traffic control, national security, and financial
transactions—to name a few. Computerization has proceeded with little
thought to what a little glitch here or a little glitch there might do—not
to mention what could happen when cyberterrorists come knocking.
Computers rely on
billions and billions of lines of code—all subject to human error or
tampering. It’s mind-numbing to contemplate the fact that critical
system failures could be caused by something as simple as a typo or a
simple homemade computer virus.
What’s the
solution? If we knew, we’d have been lobbying for it yesterday. For
now, it may be enough to begin to face the downside of technology—and
prepare for it.
Digital moths that
create havoc in a newspaper are just an annoyance. But people with any
kind of imagination would not be crazy to be scared out of their socks.