Learning from past (and others) mistakes, or not
By DICK DORWORTH
Express Staff Writer
Several days ago (Oct. 28, to be precise) two unremarkable, unrelated
events coincided to serve as a reminder that learning is an endless process, though, in
some cases, it appears beginningless.
A friend sent me an e-mail with the remembrance that on Oct. 28, 1919, the
Volstead Act was passed by the Congress of the United States. He added a personal note to
the effect that our society doesnt seem to have learned much from the debacle that
ensued from that misguided piece of legislation. I completely agree.
And I finished my annual reading of "Accidents in North American
Mountaineering." I consider this yearly publication required reading for every
climber, practical reading for anyone who ventures into the mountains further than a
hundred yards from a paved road, and recommended reading for all those interested in the
boundless drama and folly of the human condition. It is reading for those who appreciate
learning from the past and from the mistakes of others.
The Volstead Act is better known in our culture as
"Prohibition," the intemperate experiment in temperance that failed to create a
more perfect society, but succeeded in making criminals out of millions of non-criminal
members of that society. It was also successful in giving the Mafia its first stronghold
in the economic fabric of America. Prohibition, of course, was completely unsuccessful in
keeping those American citizens who wanted to drink alcohol from doing so, though, it was
the genesis of several large American fortunes, most notably and influentially that of
Joseph Kennedy.
Prohibition was a monumental, ruinous failure. Except in the fantasy minds
of people who have confused humanity with some sanitized, idealized creature who does not
exist and never did, and, naturally, in the opportunistic dishonesty of those who in one
way or another made a living from that fantasy, there was never the slightest chance that
Prohibition would succeed. The Volstead Act was foolish and naïve at best, cynical on the
part of most who supported it, evil at worst.
Todays "war on drugs" is our governments modern
version of Prohibition, and it is just as foolish, cynical and evil. Like the Volstead Act
did 80 years ago, the war on drugs will continue to dishonor the concept of a more perfect
society, as it will fail to stop people from indulging in the drugs of their choice. It
will persist in making criminals out of hundreds of thousands of non-criminal members of
our society. The legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco continue to kill more people and
destroy more lives than all "illegal" drugs combined; but, as our society had
every opportunity to learn but did not, attempting to prohibit them compounds rather than
alleviates the problem. The war on other drugs since the Volstead Act was repealed has
been a blessing to the Mafia and other organized (and, in some cases, not so organized)
criminals. And in recent years it has created an entire sector of commerce in drug war
weaponry and warriors, particularly in North America, South America (especially Columbia,
Peru and Ecuador), Southeast Asia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. It has destabilized
governments and brought far more death, destruction, misery and human wreckage to the
world than have the drugs in question.
The war on drugs has created a prison (and prison guard) industry in
America that is out of control and largely out of sight of the general populace. But it is
paid for out of your pockets with money that could be used for education, health, housing,
wilderness protection, environmental clean up, political campaign finance reforms,
subsidies for small farmers and businesses, and many other things a healthy society needs
instead of increased prisons. In excess of 2 million Americans are in prison right now,
and more than half of those prisoners are in jail because of drug related
"crimes." Only a small minority of these prisoners of the war on drugs share the
ethnicity and demographics of the citizenry of the Wood River Valley, but this is not a
reflection of the ethnicity and demographics of drug use and abuse in our society.
Prohibition did not work in the 1920s. That our society believes the war
on drugs will work now is an indication of the beginningless process of a flat learning
curve.
I am reminded of a couple of the analyses of the various incidents
reported in this years "Accidents in North American Mountaineering":
"The probability of staying healthy on the Columbia Icefields in bad weather with no
bivouac gear is considerably reduced when alone." And "Poor weather, heavy
snowfalls, and whiteout conditions are the primary contributing causes of this mishap. The
subjects lacked the judgment to turn back when the weather deteriorated, and did not plan
for white-out navigation
.It is very easy to get lost on the upper mountain, due to
the featureless nature of the terrain."
"The subjects" of these mountaineering accidents sound to me
like the warriors in the war on drugs.